Cases 71 - 80 of 4,723
Mancia-Espinosa v. Garland
as 24-1275
Petitioner:
RUDY ALEXANDER MANCIA-ESPINOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Irvine et al v. University of Washington
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Alexander Irvine and Barbara Twaddell
Defendant:
University of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Clark v. GSL Properties, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Brooklynn C. Clark
Defendant:
GSL Properties, Inc., CBRF GWS Real Estate Services, Inc., One + Three Centerpointe Drive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
United States of America v. Smirnov
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALEXANDER SMIRNOV
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Padilla Ochoa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1005
Petitioner:
EDWIN ALEXANDER PADILLA OCHOA, ERIKA FAVIOLA BERMUDEZ CRUZ, KENDALL MAYBETH PADILLA BERMUDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08038
Petitioner:
Alexander Greer Williams
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Coleman v. Goff et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Andrew Coleman and Andrew James Coleman
Defendant:
Alexander Goff, Karina Golosinskiy, Lucas Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smirnov v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 24-970
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER SMIRNOV
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
