Cases 81 - 90 of 4,723
Pratt v. Palmer et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Reggie Antonio Pratt
Defendant:
Michael Palmer, The United States of America, United States Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Julian et al v. Purple Innovation, LLC
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Mason Julian and Alexander Tat
Defendant:
Purple Innovation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Aleman v. Garland
as 24-847
Petitioner:
ROY ALEXANDER ALEMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Alexander v. Aranda, et al.
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Julian J. Alexander
Defendant:
Aranda, Ortega and Guerro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Kline et al
as 2:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
Harry Alexander Knight
Respondent:
Unknown Kline, United States Marshals Service and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knight v. USA
as 2:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Harry Alexander Knight
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowen v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05123
Plaintiff:
Stacy Bowen
Defendant:
Clark County, Grant Hagen, Austin Cloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B., et al. v. Premera Blue Cross, et al.
as 24-757
Plaintiff:
OKSANA B., ALEXANDER B. and A.B.
Defendant:
PREMERA BLUE CROSS, TABLEAU SOFTWARE INC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN and SALESFORCE.COM HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
