Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Cadenas
as 23-50097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Rolando Cadenas, also known as Mario Alexander Calderon-Campos, also known as Mario Calderon-Campos
USA v. Cadenas
as 23-50094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Rolando Cadenas, also known as Mario Alexander Calderon-Campos, also known as Mario Calderon-Campos
Calderon-Sanchez v. Garland
as 22-2006
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALEXANDER CALDERON-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Leydi Mazariegos Escobar, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3353
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
LEYDI YONILDA MAZARIEGOS ESCOBAR and OMAR ALEXANDER CALDERON MAZARIEGOS
CALDERON-GERENA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv12582
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER CALDERON-GERENA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angel Calderon Ruiz v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-1603
Petitioner:
ANGEL ALEXANDER CALDERON RUIZ, JESSY JUDITH PADILLA REYES, F.A.C.P. and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Calderon-Lopez v. United States et al
as 3:2016cv01055
Plaintiff:
Alexander Calderon-Lopez
Defendant:
United States and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander Calderon v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv01642
Plaintiff:
Alexander Calderon
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Does and NBS Default Services, LLC
Silvio Estrada-Escamilla v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73713
Petitioner:
SILVIO ALEXANDER ESTRADA-ESCAMILLA, AKA Silvio Alexander Calderon, AKA Silvio Escamilla, AKA Cenes Moniker
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
