Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07272
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00759
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02563
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
A. v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2026cv00390
Petitioner:
R. C. A.
Defendant:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Angie Salazar, Alex Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
L.L. v. Wesling et al
as 3:2025cv02125
Defendant:
David Wesling, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem and others
Petitioner:
J. A. L.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bonning v. Idaho State Police, et al.
as 25-5659
Plaintiff:
AMY ROSE BONNING
Defendant:
IDAHO STATE POLICE, BRADLEY JAY LITTLE, GOVERNOR OF IDAHO, Governor for Idaho, BRANDON WOLF, Idaho State Controller and others
Davids, et al. v. Adams, et al.
as 1:2025cv00334
Plaintiff:
Abby Davids, K. P., N. R. and others
Defendant:
Alex Adams, Miren Unsworth, Elke Shaw-Tulloch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delgado v. City of San Antonio et.al
as 5:2025cv00313
Plaintiff:
Alex Adam delgado
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, San Antonio Police Department, Officer Bless Achor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2025sf65182
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
