Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Case name not on file
as 3:2026cv02494
Unknown:
Chris Hoffman
Defendant:
Niko Logistics Corporation and Abddukadir Ali Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SAGHIRI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01066
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD ALI SAGHIRI
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00365
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04794
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Noble Ali v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 26-2894
Plaintiff:
NOBLE DREW ALI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSIONERS and others
Warisuzzaman v. City of Phoenix, et al.
as 26-4770
Plaintiff:
ALI WARISUZZAMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHOENIX, PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT, E. GUSTAFSON, Officer and others
OKAFOR v. ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE N REPRESENTATIVES IN RELATION TO INCIDENT et al
as 2:2026cv09401
Plaintiff:
ONYEMAECHI OKAFOR
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE N REPRESENTATIVES IN RELATION TO INCIDENT, NEWARK BETH ISRAEL, AHMAD ALI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
