Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv05885
Plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 4HAO Store, Armrest box Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ALEXANDER v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2017cv02347
Plaintiff:
ALICIA ALEXANDER
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., N.V. Organon, Merck Sharp & Dohme and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as NJ/2:17-cv-06048
Plaintiff:
ALICIA ALEXANDER
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC. , N.V. ORGANON , MERCK SHARP & DOHME and others
Alexander v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00667
Plaintiff:
Alicia Alexander
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Janie Myles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06048
Plaintiff:
ALICIA ALEXANDER
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC., N.V. ORGANON, MERCK SHARP & DOHME and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12893
Plaintiff:
Alicia Alexander
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. , Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as MSN/4:13-cv-00200
Plaintiff:
Alicia Alexander
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Alexander v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Alicia Alexander
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
