Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Saintillus-Bey v. State of Florida et al
as 9:2024cv80229
Plaintiff:
Shalam C. Saintillus-Bey
Defendant:
State of Florida, State Attorneys, Dave Aronberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Johnson v. The City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lamar Allan Johnson
Defendant:
The City of St. Louis, Missouri, Joseph Nickerson, Clyde Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05225
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALLAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. SHULER et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
J SHULER, K PEARSON, MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Freeman et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
William Allan Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Freeman, Forsyth County Det. Center and Dr. Gowdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DOE 1 et al
as 4:2020cv00579
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78263
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62392
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32513
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEAN ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00608
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
