Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Newman et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
Darnell Newman and Clarence Stokes
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Amber L Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Weaver v. Harbinson et al
as 3:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Marcus Weaver
Defendant:
Mrs. Harbinson, J.S. Walton, Randall Pass and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newman et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2015cv02981
Plaintiff:
Darnell Newman and Clarence Stokes
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Amber L Nelson
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 0409
Gregory v. Chamness et al
as 3:2013cv01124
Plaintiff:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Defendant:
Tony Chamness, Jeff Baney, Weasel Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
RILEY v. WARD et al
as 2:2013cv00146
Respondent:
ALL BUREAU OF PRISON EMPLOYEES, AMBER L. NELSON, J. OLIVER and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL JOHN RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roger Sedlak v. J.S. Walton, et al
as 13-1329
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER SEDLAK
Respondent - Appellee:
J.S. WALTON, Warden, Warden, M. CALL, Case Manager, A. AVILIES, Unit Manager and others
Fernando Bustillo v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 13-1232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley Lappin, Amber L. Nelson, Regional Director, Juan Castillo, Warden and others
NEAL v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2012cv00298
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, CHARLES L. LOCKETT, AMBER L. NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Karsten v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv02107
Plaintiff:
Brian Ray Karsten
Defendant:
Blake R. Davis, P.A. Camacho and Amber L. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
