Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5017
Plaintiff - Appellant: Larry Elliott Klayman, Michael Ferrari, Charles Strange and others
Defendant - Appellee: Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Keith Alexander and others
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5005
Plaintiff - Appellee: Larry Elliott Klayman, Michael Ferrari, Charles Strange and others
Defendant - Appellant: Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Keith Alexander and others
Defendant - Appellee: Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, Google, Inc. and others
Atwood v. Lyons et al
as 3:2013cv00711
Plaintiff: David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant: John Lyons, Patrick Park, America Online, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Gangi
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Plaintiff: PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Doe 1 through Doe 4 v. America Online, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04817
Plaintiff: Doe 1 through Doe 4
Defendant: America Online, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
Renaissance Marketing Corporation v. America Online Inc.
as 1:2012cv00376
Defendant: America Online Inc.
Plaintiff: Renaissance Marketing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Transcenic Inc. v. Google Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00582
Plaintiff: Transcenic Inc.
Defendant: Google Inc. , Microsoft Corporation , America Online Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?