Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Royce Solomon v. Mark Curry
as 19-1267
Defendant: AWL, INC., MIDDLEMARCH SECURITIES, LLC, DHI COMPUTING SERVICE, INC. and others
Plaintiff: SONJI GRANDY, as individuals and as representatives of the classes, DASHAWN HUNTER, as individuals and as representatives of the classes, LULA WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: GIULIANNA LOMAGLIO, JODI BELLECI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MICHAEL LITTLEJOHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK CURRY and SOL PARTNERS
Amicus Curiae: ONLINE LENDERS ALLIANCE, NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS, NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION and others
Florence Mussat v. IQVIA, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1204
Plaintiff / Appellant: FLORENCE MUSSAT, M.D., S.C., on behalf of plaintiff and class members defined herein
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOES 1-10 and IQVIA, INC.
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE
American Health Care Association et al v. Burwell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00233
Plaintiff: American Health Care Association , Mississippi Health Care Association , Great Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center and others
Defendant: Sylvia Mathews Burwell , Andrew M. Slavitt and American Association for Justice Et. Al.
Amicu: US Chamber Litigation Center
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Sandra Waite, et al v. AII Acquisition Corp., et al
as 16-15569
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES JOHN WAITE, JR. and SANDRA WAITE
Defendant / Appellee: AII ACQUISITION CORP., f.k.a. Holland Furnace, a.k.a. Allegheny Technologies, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Amicus Curiae: THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE
Pierce v. U.C. Berkeley School of Law, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02694
Plaintiff: Seavon Pierce
Defendant: U.C. Berkeley School of Law, New York Times, Washington City Paper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Tarricone
as 13-4321
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rhonda Hill Wilson
Defendant - Appellee: Anthony Tarricone, Kriendler and Kreindler Law Firm, 710 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10007 and American Association for Justice, 777 North 6th Street, Northwest, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20001, FKA Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Wilson v. Tarricone et al
as 1:2012cv05337
Plaintiff: Rhonda Hill Wilson
Defendant: Anthony Tarricone and The American Association for Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Association for Justice v. American Trial Lawyer, Inc., The et al
as 0:2009cv00709
Plaintiff: American Association for Justice and American Association for Justice
Defendant: American Trial Lawyer, Inc., The and US Legal Publications
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
In re: Abrams & Abrams, P.A.
as 09-1285
: In re: ABRAMS & ABRAMS, P.A. and ST. MARTIN, WILLIAMS AND BOURQUE
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY PELLEGRIN, Guardian Ad Litem for Mark Pellegrin
Defendant - None: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
Amicus Supporting Appellant: LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE and PUBLIC JUSTICE
Court-Assigned Amicus Counsel: THOMAS SHIPLEY JONES
Type: Contract Insurance
Abrams & Abrams, P.A. v. National Union Fire Insurance We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1283
Appellant: In re: ABRAMS & ABRAMS, P.A. and ST. MARTIN, WILLIAMS AND BOURQUE
Plaintiff: JERRY PELLEGRIN, Guardian Ad Litem for Mark Pellegrin
Defendant - None: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
Amicus Supporting Appellant: LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE and PUBLIC JUSTICE
Court-Assigned Amicus Counsel: THOMAS S. JONES
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?