Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ivan Lee Matthews II v. Twin Towers Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv09420
Plaintiff: Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Defendant: Twin Towers Correctional Facility, Los Angeles Sherrifs Department, Los Angeles County Jail System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan Lee Matthews II v. North County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv07962
Plaintiff: Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Defendant: North County Correctional Facility, Twin Towers Correctional Facility 1 and 2, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon Rasmussen v. Pat Garret
as 20-35849
Respondent / Appellee: PAT GARRET
Petitioner / Appellant: VERNON LEE RASMUSSEN
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ACLU OF OREGON, AND PROFESSORS OF CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Julio Villeda v. Pat Garret
as 20-35851
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO VILLEDA
Respondent / Appellee: PAT GARRET
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ACLU OF OREGON, AND PROFESSORS OF CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Jayson Mee v. Pat Garret
as 20-35850
Petitioner / Appellant: JAYSON ROBERT MEE
Respondent / Appellee: PAT GARRET
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ACLU OF OREGON, AND PROFESSORS OF CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
United States Government v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-41077
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES AGGREY-KWEGGYIR ARUNGA, and all Other Allies of the United States of America, Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, 7+years Imperial Administrations and Expulsions Fuzes of President Barack Hussein Obama and Vice President "Joe" Biden, JOSEPH "JOE" BIDEN, 7+years Imperial Administrations and Expulsions Fuzes of President Barack Hussein Obama and Vice President Joseph "Joe" Biden, S. BREYER, Scoutus Dictum Expulsion Fainaiguing Fuzes and others
United States Government et al v. Obama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff: United States Government, Jus Hetero Generational-Propagational Posterity-Citizenships, Texas and 26-States of Union and others
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph "Joe" Biden, S. Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al
as 16-55425
Plaintiff / Appellee: FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Intervenor: ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS KEN WILLIAMS, MARI BARKE, LISA SPARKS, JOHN BEDELL, REBECCA GOMEZ, IN THEIR OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES
Amicus Curiae: JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-55425
Plaintiff - Appellee: FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
RICHES v. BUSH et al Featured Case
as 2:2006cv01055
Defendant: USAMA BIN LADEN, SHADY RECORDS INC, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Petitioner: DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH and PATRICK J. SIMPSON
Not Yet Classified: M. C. HAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?