Cases 1 - 10 of 26
American Civil Rights Union v. Brenda Snipes, et al
as 18-11808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS UNION
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA SNIPES, in her official capacity as the Supervisor of Elections of Broward County, Florida and 1199SEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST
Corman et al v. Torres et al
as 1:2018cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jacob Corman , Michael Folmer , Lou Barletta and others
Defendant:
Robert Torres and Jonathan M. Marks
Amicu:
Brian McCann , National Democratic Redistricting Committee , League of Women Voters of Pennyslvania and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Carmen Febo San Miguel , James Solomon , John Greiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Bellitto et al v. Snipes
as 0:2016cv61474
Plaintiff:
Andrea Bellitto and American Civil Rights Union
Defendant:
Brenda Snipes
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
US v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and KIM WESTBROOK STRACH
Intervenor Defendant:
CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, STACEY STITT, MARIA DIAZ and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, BRIAN M. MILLER, EBONY N. WEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA STOHLER, KAY BRANDON, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified:
BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS UNION v. PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSIONERS
as 2:2016cv01507
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS UNION
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
American Civil Rights Union v. Montalvo
as 7:2016cv00103
Defendant:
Rafael R Montalvo
Plaintiff:
American Civil Rights Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
