Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv05716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mersadies Bonilla v. American Heritage Federal
as 21-1580
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERSADIES BONILLA
AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. Profectus Collocationes LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JARED DAVIS and Profectus Collocationes LLC
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv18704
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BONILLA v. AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2020cv02276
Defendant:
DANIELLE BASICH, BRANCH MANAGER UNKNOWN, BRUCE FOLUKE and others
Plaintiff:
MERSADIES BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRATER v. AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2018cv05515
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MATTHEW JAMES, JOH DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BONILLA v. AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 2:2018cv03293
Plaintiff:
MERSADIES BONILLA
Defendant:
AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northeastern Engineers Federal, et al v. HD, et al
as 17-14741
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, FIRST CHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, GARY LOWENTHAL and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
HOME DEPOT, INC. (THE) and THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
