Cases 21 - 30 of 78
American Lung Association v. EPA
as 21-1063
Petitioner:
American Lung Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1027
Petitioner:
American Lung Association, Natural Resources Defense Council, National Parks Conservation Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Helen N. Robbins-Meyer and County of San Diego
Plaintiff:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Public Health Law Center, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, American Lung Association and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
In re: American E-Liquid
as 19-2242
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, NORMAN E. SHARPLESS, in his Official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Appellant:
ARIZONA SMOKE FREE BUSINESS ALLIANCE, AMERICAN VAPING ASSOCIATION, OHIO VAPOR TRADE ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, TRUTH INITIATIVE, LEAH BRASCH and others
Amicus Curiae:
MICHAEL SIEGEL, STATE OF MARYLAND, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
American Academy of Pediatrics, et al v. Andrew Wheeler
as 20-1221
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Council of Maine, Downwinders at Risk, American Academy of Pediatrics and others
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
ARIPPA v. EPA
as 16-1175
Petitioner:
ARIPPA
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
In re: Cigar Association
as 19-2130
Intervenor:
SMOKE-FREE ALTERNATIVES TRADE ASSOCIATION- TEXAS, NEW YORK STATE VAPOR ASSOCIATION, CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN HIRSCH, MD, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, LINDA GOLDSTEIN, MD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Appellant:
CIGAR RIGHTS OF AMERICA, PREMIUM CIGAR ASSOCIATION, f/k/a International Premium Cigar and Pipe Retailers Association and In re: CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HEALTH OFFICERS and STATE OF MARYLAND
American Academy of Pediatrics v. FDA
as 19-2198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN HIRSCH, MD, TRUTH INITIATIVE, MARYLAND CHAPTER- AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SCOTT GOTTLIEB, in his Official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
American Academy of Pediatrics v. American E-Liquid
as 19-2132
Not Yet Classified:
RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, MARYLAND VAPOR ALLIANCE, IOWANS FOR ALTERNATIVE TO SMOKING AND TOBACCO and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESPIRATORY CARE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEAH BRASCH, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK and others
American Academy of Pediatrics, et al v. FDA
as 19-1507
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DR. LYNDA YOUNG, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, DR. TED KREMER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
US FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
