Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,047
Sparks v. 4520 Corp., Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14276
Cross Defendant: Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, Joy Technologies, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Defendant: Townsend & Bottum, Inc., Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Oglebay Norton Company and others
Plaintiff: Victor W. Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
NL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. OLD BRIDGE TOWNSHIP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv03493
Cross Defendant: UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ATLANTIC BATTERY CORPORATION, PHV HAROLD L. SEGALL and others
Counter Defendant: ATLANTIC BATTERY CO., UNITED STATES ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS, JOE KRENTZMAN & SON, INC. and others
Defendant: Crown Battery Manufacturing Company, RIO TINTO MINERALS, AMETEK, INC. and others
Cross Claimant: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court: MICHAEL P. LAST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
BLAKENEY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv60005
Plaintiff: DONNA C. OGDEN BLAKENEY , ANTHONY OGDEN , ALAN R. OGDEN and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS, CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Howell et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff: Richard N. Howell and Esther L. Howell
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Ametek, Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: A.W. Chesterton, Inc.
Cross_defendant: A.W. Chesterton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Blakeney et al v. Crane Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01039
Plaintiff: Donna C. Ogden Blakeney , Anthony Ogden , Alan R. Ogden and others
Defendant: 3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Shintaku et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00060
Plaintiff: Roxane E. Shintaku and Rosei Shinsato
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation , Goulds Pumps, Inc. and Yarway Corporation
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Ametek, Inc., Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Dote v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff: Warren K. Dote
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Agodong v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00021
Plaintiff: Nancy Agodong
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Behlert et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff: Joseph A. Behlert and Maria Luisa Behlert
Defendant: Crane Company , Air Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Atlas Valve Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
VAUGHAN v. 3M COMPANY, et al
as 1:2012cv01231
Plaintiff: GENEVA D. VAUGHAN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?