Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Silva v. Principal Life Insurance Co.
as 7:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Ana Silva
Defendant:
Principal Life Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
SILVA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15240
Plaintiff:
ANA SILVA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grant v. PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 9:2022cv04262
Plaintiff:
Terry Lennette Grant
Defendant:
PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC, Peter Wolf, Esq, WOLF & MOGIL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Silva-Negrete v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv03029
Plaintiff:
Ana Silva-Negrete
Defendant:
Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRANT v. ARCURE et al
as 1:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
TERRY LENNETTE GRANT
Defendant:
MARVIN H. DUKES, III, MAGALIE A. ARCURE, ANDREW M. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02653
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ana Franco v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 13-1912
Petitioner:
Ana Silva Franco Franco
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Martinez v. Infante et al
as 1:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Francisco M. Martinez
Defendant:
Natalia (I) Lorena Infante, Natalia Lorena Infante, Joan (I) R. Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pablo Garcia-Delgado, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-72070
Petitioner:
PABLO ANTONIO GARCIA-DELGADO, MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA-INDA, PABLO SERGIO GARCIA-INDA and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
