Cases 41 - 50 of 1,871
Bey v. Pickens et al
as 8:2023cv05593
Petitioner:
Malcolm Bey and Malcolm Rawlinson Bey
Respondent:
Jeremy Pickens, Isaac K Fekete and Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2023cv02780
Petitioner:
Jerome Anderson
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ethan Anderson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13469
Petitioner / Appellant:
ETHAN ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Joshua Anderson v. Fernando Garza
as 23-3846
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA GARY ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FERNANDO GARZA
Green v. Anderson
as 3:2023cv00668
Petitioner:
Albert Leroy Green, Jr.
Respondent:
Ben Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Nail
as 6:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Jonathan Mitchell Anderson
Respondent:
Commissioner Michael W. Nail
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vice v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00406
Petitioner:
Chad M. Vice
Respondent:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Corrections, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrence Booth v. David Anderson
as 23-7000
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRENCE MACK BOOTH
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID ANDERSON
Doni Anderson v. Kenneth Nelson
as 23-6979
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONI TERRELE ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MR. KENNETH NELSON, Warden
Anderson v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00631
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lamar Anderson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
