Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Rodriguez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05947
Plaintiff:
Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
USA v. Angel Rodriguez
as 23-2395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ
Daniel Rodriguez v. Warden Janson
as 23-6702
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI EDGEFIELD
Rodriguez v. Janson FCI Edgefield
as 1:2023cv01893
Petitioner:
Daniel Angel Rodriguez and Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Janson FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Robinson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Detective Shantai Vasquez, Detective Angel Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel Rodriguez v. USA, et al
as 22-16403
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOSE RAMOS
Rodriguez v. United States Of America
as 1:2022cv22058
Plaintiff:
Danny Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00459
Petitioner:
Alvaro Angel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
