Cases 1 - 10 of 7,915
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ESPOSITO v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv05556
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ESPOSITO
Defendant:
FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITROS v. CASTILLO/MARR et al
as 1:2024cv05420
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
MELISSA CASTILLO/MARR, A. M. and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE BUENA BARRACKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01649
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MCLEMORE v. WEB CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MCLEMORE
Defendant:
WEB CONSTRUCTION, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
