Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Walker v. Carbor et al
as 2:2024cv11093
Plaintiff: Anthony Daniel Walker
Defendant: Kim Carbor, Marienfield, Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker #256640 v. Carbor et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff: Anthony Daniel Walker #256640
Defendant: Kim Carbor, Unknown Marienfield, Unknown Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Dotson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner: Joseph Anthony Daniels
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00070
Petitioner: Joseph Anthony Daniels
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Royce
as 23-103
Petitioner / Appellant: Anthony Daniels
Respondent / Appellee: Mark Royce
Joseph Daniels v. Michael Gaither
as 22-6926
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH ANTHONY DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL GAITHER, Medical Doctor, VINCENT GORE, Medical Doctor and B. ALEXANDER, Registered Nurse
Daniels v. Gaither et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00526
Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Daniels
Defendant: Michael Gaither, Vincent Gore and B. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Smith
as 1:2021cv01651
Defendant: No Named Defendant and Kim Smith
Plaintiff: Anthony Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00702
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke
Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Royce We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv06603
Petitioner: Anthony Daniels
Respondent: Mark Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?