Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hernandez v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Lyle Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Pima County Adult Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Anthony Hernandez v. Ronald J. Broomfield
as 2:2022cv02592
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Ronald J. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Anthony Hernandez v. Ronald J. Broomfield
as 5:2021cv01847
Petitioner:
George Anthony Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Ronald J. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. County of San Diego Child Protective Services et al
as 3:2020cv00011
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 10, Carly Ray, County of San Diego Child Protective Services and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Hernandez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hernandez v. Washburn
as 2:2019cv01376
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Hernandez
Respondent:
Sue Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HERNANDEZ v. SMITH et al
as 5:2019cv00508
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MELVIN ANTHONY HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. Thomas
as 2:2017cv01803
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt et al v. RVVCO et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez, Cody Markell and Lederrick Nesbitt
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Medford Police Department and RVVCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Hernandez v. Michael Melvin
as 16-3783
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MELVIN
Hernandez v. Kennedy
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Troy Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
