Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ramey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2021cv02990
Plaintiff:
Anthony Paul Ramey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
US v. Anthony Velasquez
as 20-6801
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY PAUL VELASQUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Velasquez v. USA
as 5:2016cv00093
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Paul Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Velasquez v. USA
as 5:2015cv00025
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Paul Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anthony Pauling v. Michael Roseboro
as 11-7617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY PAULING
Plaintiff:
EDITH R. BOULWARE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ROSEBORO, official and individual cap and HERMAN YOUNG, official and individual cap
Defendant:
WILLIAM F. POPE, official and ind cap
Pauling et al v. Roseboro et al
as 0:2011cv00842
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pauling
Defendant:
Micheal Roseboro, Herman Young and William F Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Anthony Feurtado
as 09-7949
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY FEURTADO, a/k/a Anthony Greene, a/k/a Ginzo, a/k/a Gap, a/k/a Pretty Tony, a/k/a Tony Feurtado, a/k/a Anthony Lamar Brown, a/k/a Anthony Paul
US v. Anthony Feurtado
as 08-8164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY FEURTADO, a/k/a Anthony Greene, a/k/a Ginzo, a/k/a Gap, a/k/a Pretty Tony, a/k/a Tony Feurtado, a/k/a Anthony Lamar Brown, a/k/a Anthony Paul
US v. Anthony Feurtado
as 08-4350
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY FEURTADO, a/k/a Anthony Greene, a/k/a Ginzo, a/k/a Gap, a/k/a Pretty Tony, a/k/a Tony Feurtado, a/k/a Anthony Lamar Brown, a/k/a Anthony Paul
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
