Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
STERLING v. ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00390
Defendant:
ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC , HERSCHEND FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CORP., INC., SECURITAS SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON STERLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salahuddin Smart v. Aramark Inc, et al
as 14-3782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK INC, JEFFREY BURRELL, ARAMARK SUPERVISOR, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
SMART v. ARAMARK INC. et al
as 1:2014cv03007
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
ARAMARK INC., JEFFREY BURRELL, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sollog Adonai-Adoni v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 12-3606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, CAULK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv05485
Plaintiff:
KASHIEF WHITE
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIPHANT v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv03782
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND OLIPHANT
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
