Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armacell LLC v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv01980
Plaintiff:
Armacell LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Customs & Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Armacell LLC v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Armacell LLC
Defendant:
United States, United States Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine C. Tai and others
68th Street Site Work Group v. Alban Tractor Co., Incorporated
as 23-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
68TH STREET SITE WORK GROUP
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBAN TRACTOR CO., INCORPORATED, C & I LEASING INCORPORATED, RUKERT TERMINALS CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC., A&M (2015) LLC, ABACUS CORPORATION and others
Armacell LLC v. Bailey Sales & Associates Inc
as 2:2019cv00506
Plaintiff:
Armacell LLC
Defendant:
Bailey Sales & Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armacell, LLC v. Bailey Sales & Associates, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00408
Plaintiff:
Armacell, LLC
Defendant:
Bailey Sales & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K-Flex USA, L.L.C. v. Armacell, LLC
as 5:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
K-Flex USA, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Armacell, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ARMACELL LLC v. AEROFLEX USA, INC.
as 1:2013cv00896
Plaintiff:
ARMACELL LLC
Defendant:
AEROFLEX USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Aeroflex USA, Inc v. Armacell Enterprise GMBH et al (TV2)
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Aeroflex USA, Inc
Defendant:
Armacell Enterprise GMBH, Armacell, LLC and Armacell United States Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
