Cases 21 - 30 of 3,748
Wimberly v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Craig Ervin Wimberly
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, C. Herman, J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Zavala v. C. Nash, et al
as 24-10735
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZAVALA
Defendant:
C. NASH, WHITEHEAD, BROWNFIELD and others
Henry v. Parr-Mirza et al
as 2:2024cv10595
Plaintiff:
Arnold V Henry
Defendant:
Parr-Mirza, B. Schaschko, Angela Joseph and others
Johnson v. Owner of Vehicle, et al.
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Johnson
Defendant:
Owner of Vehicle, Nampa Police Officers, Ronald N. Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Arnold v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1423
Plaintiff:
DALE ARNOLD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Arnold Covington v. Florida Attorney General, et al
as 24-10671
Petitioner:
ARNOLD A. COVINGTON
Respondent:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Lindberg v. Clendenion et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Lindberg
Defendant:
Jason Clendenion, Josesph Gilbert, Ted Baltimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shattuck v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Charles Shattuck
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Unknown (#36308), Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold (PS) v. Colorado Board of Parole et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Petitioner:
David Ray Arnold
Respondent:
Colorado Board of Parole, Colorado Department of Corrections, Director of Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold (PS) v. Shuster et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
David Ray Arnold
Respondent:
Doug Shuster, Colorado Department of Corrections Director, CDOC Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
