Cases 71 - 80 of 6,935
Blackard et al v. Hercules, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Mary Frances Blackard , Ervin Booth , Lynn Booth and others
Defendant:
Hercules, Inc. and Ashland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ashland Inc. v. Leo Long, Jr., et al
as 12-35775
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASHLAND INC
Defendant - Appellant:
LEO H LONG, Jr. and THOMAS C LONG
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center v. Blue Cross of California et al
as 2:2012cv07008
Defendant:
PGFC, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan, Skechers USA, Inc., Vertis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DiMeglio v. Ashland Inc.
as 1:2012cv00972
Plaintiff:
David DiMeglio
Defendant:
Ashland Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashland Inc v. Leo Long, Jr., et al
as 12-35544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLAND INC
Defendant - Appellee:
LEO H LONG, Jr. and THOMAS C LONG
Garrie v. A I U Insurance Co et al
as 2:2012cv01615
Defendant:
Texaco Inc , Rockwell Automation Inc , American Centennial Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Ashland Inc
as 2:2012cv00705
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Ashland Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SUMMERS v. ASHLAND, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01540
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SUMMERS
Defendant:
ASHLAND, INC. , ASHLAND and ASHLAND CHEMICAL CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Davis et al
as 1:1985cv00616
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Davis, Sr. , Eleanor Davis , William Davis and others
Movant:
Ashland Inc. , Life Technologies Corporation , FKI Industries and Bristol, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
