Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
CUTHBERTSON v. ATKINS et al
as 1:2023cv02005
Plaintiff: JALEN CUTHBERTSON
Defendant: BRENTON ATKINS, ANTHONY BOONE, ALFRED BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATKINS v. CHIKOSI
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff: AVIS ATKINS
Defendant: TANAKA CHIKOSI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BOOTHE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2022cv01747
Plaintiff: SHASTRI BOOTHE, JARED BLAND, JOSHUA CHAMBERS and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01916
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
ARUNACHALAM v. HARRIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03734
Defendant: SCOTT S. HARRIS, LAW360/PORTFOLIO MEDIA, INC., JEFFREY ATKINS and others
Plaintiff: LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00686
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
ATKINS v. ANTISKAY
as 1:2019cv03513
Respondent: MICHAEL ANTISKAY
Petitioner: MAKEBA ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant: MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff: DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01206
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?