Cases 1 - 10 of 571
Gainous v. Faircloth et al
as 6:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Allen Gainous
Defendant:
Warden Jeremy Faircloth, Administrator Da'more and Lieutenant Miguel Aviles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gainous v. Faircloth et al
as 8:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allen Gainous
Defendant:
Jeremy Faircloth, Administrator Da'more, Lieutenant Miguel Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. AVILES
as 2:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julio Aviles Sr v. USP Lompoc Warden
as 2:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Julio Aviles, Sr
Respondent:
USP Lompoc Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Julio Aviles, Sr. v. USA
as 23-3224
Plaintiff:
JULIO AVILES, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richardson v. Weaver et al
as 6:2023cv02409
Plaintiff:
Jaleer S. Richardson
Defendant:
Sergeant B T. Weaver, Correctional Officer S. Aviles, Correctional Officer D Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avilles-Avilles v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01483
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Avilles-Avilles
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Aviles, Sr. v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01851
Petitioner:
Julio Aviles, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GRAHAM v. SWAT TEAM et al
as 2:2023cv13097
Plaintiff:
CHRIS GRAHAM
Defendant:
SWAT TEAM, THORTON, FRANCINE CIFUENTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
