Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Bamba v. US
as 26-1675
Plaintiff:
ABASS YAYA BAMBA, Assignee of Y2FOX, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Doe v. University of Texas
as 26-50226
Plaintiff:
Doctor Jane Doe
Defendant:
University of Texas at San Antonio, School of Dentistry, Doctor Kenneth M. Hargreaves, Doctor Maria Karakousoglou and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01416
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Anderson v. MCA Back Office LLC et al
as 1:2025cv06601
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCA BACK OFFICE LLC, SARA KING, KING FAMILY LENDING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAMBA v. USA
as 1:2025cv01876
Plaintiff:
ABASS YAYA BAMBA
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv05280
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FILING ERROR
as 5:2025cv01139
Plaintiff:
Audrey Iran Rakian
Defendant:
University of Texas at San Antonio, School of Dentistry, Kenneth M Hargreaves, Maria Karakousoglou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v University of San Antonio, et al.
as 5:2025cv01140
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jane Doe
Defendant:
University of Texas at San Antonio, School of Dentistry, Dr. Kenneth M Hargreaves, Dr. Maria Karakousoglou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
H. L. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2025cv05642
Plaintiff:
H. L., D. L., Cleavotta Morgan and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Kazeem Abass, Nchegem Orji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Bamba
as 25-1073
Petitioner:
In re: ABASS YAYA BAMBA
Respondent:
PHILIP J. WEISER, JEREMIAH BRUNNER and ALEX BOGUNIEWICZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
