Cases 11 - 20 of 49
In re: Abdul-Aziz Muhammad
as 17-5823
Movant:
In re: ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Dane Heady
as 17-6081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DANE HEADY, Retired Unit Manager, MICHAEL WEAVER, Health Service Administrator, EDDIE ANDERSON, DO and others
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Katherine Laybourn
as 16-6806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE LAYBOURN, Physician/Clinical Director (acting) (MD/CD), R. L. HUTCHINGS, Associate Warden (AW), CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons (DBOP) and others
In re: Abdul-Aziz Muhammad
as 16-5775
Movant:
In re: ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Muhammad v. USA
as 2:2016cv00076
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad v. Laybourn et al
as 3:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
Katherine Laybourn, R. L. Hutchings, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RASHID MUHAMMAD v. GEHRKE et al
as 2:2015cv00334
Defendant:
FORTUNE, GEHRKE, PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RASHID MUHAMMAD v. RUPSKA et al
as 2:2015cv00228
Defendant:
HEATHER ATTERBURY, T. BAILEY, LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER BLILA and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Eric Wilson
as 14-7735
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden of FCC Petersburg
Muhammad v. Wilson
as 3:2014cv00387
Petitioner:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Respondent:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
