Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Fuqua School of Business, et al
as 25-1600
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Defendant:
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, MOIRA RINGO, WL GORE & ASSOCIATES and others
LEIDOS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
LEIDOS, INC. and BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. v. USA
as 1:2025cv00170
Plaintiff:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Andrew v. Accenture Federal Services LLC et al
as 1:2025cv00089
Defendant:
Accenture Federal Services LLC and John B. Goodman
Plaintiff:
Paytawn Andrew Erskine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cook v. Accenture LLP et al
as 1:2024cv05961
Defendant:
N3 LLC and Accenture LLP
Plaintiff:
Mary Alissa Cook
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Mudimu v. Accenture LLP
as 8:2024cv02561
Plaintiff:
Vimbai Mudimu
Defendant:
Accenture LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
TELESTO GROUP, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
TELESTO GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Fuqua School of Business, et al
as 24-2869
Defendant:
EMERGENT GAME TECHNOLOGIES, TALECRIS BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC, SIGNALSCAPE INC and others
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
