Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Carbajal v. Hayes Management Services, Inc., et al.
as 24-2870
Plaintiff:
MARIA ANGELICA CARBAJAL and Angie Carbajal
Defendant:
HAYES MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., CHRIS HAYES and HAYES TAX & ACCOUNTING SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Patriot Brands, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
American Patriot Brands, Inc., Urban Pharms, LLC, DJ & S Property #1, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Workman v. Professional Account Services, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04519
Plaintiff:
Candy Workman
Defendant:
Professional Account Services, Inc. doing business as PASI
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SUTTON v. BROADWAY ACCOUNT SERVICES INC et al
as 4:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
ERIC SUTTON
Defendant:
BROADWAY ACCOUNT SERVICES INC and EMILIO GALARZA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
