Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 990
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff: BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant: STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Derrick Brown, Jr. v. Misty Mackey
as 24-3157
Petitioner: DERRICK L. BROWN, JR.
Respondent: MISTY MACKEY, Acting Warden
McLean v. Greenfield
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner: Lenroy McLean
Respondent: Acting Warden Greenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff: AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant: TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
Cisneros v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00822
Plaintiff: Miguel A. Cisneros
Defendant: Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaber v. Ray et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Faouzi Jaber
Defendant: Warden Ray, Acting Warden Brown, Officer Titlle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines
as 24-6093
Petitioner: CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
Respondent: JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines
as 24-6086
Petitioner: CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN
Respondent: JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Pickens v. Buss
as 24-5008
Petitioner: DARRIN LYNN PICKENS
Respondent: DAVID BUSS, Acting Warden
Sayres v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff: Tadashi Sayres
Defendant: State of California, State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?