Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adam Steele, et al v. USA
as 24-5076
Plaintiff:
Adam Steele and Krystal Comer
Defendant:
United States of America
STEELE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
ADAM STEELE and KRYSTAL COMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
STEELE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69384
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM STEELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele v. City Of Bemidji, The, Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv01620
Defendant:
City Of Bemidji, The, Minnesota and Other Unnamed Persons and Entities
Plaintiff:
Adam Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brittany Montrois, et al v. USA
as 17-5204
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Brittany Montrois, Class of More Than 700,000 Similarly Situated Individuals and Businesses, Adam Steele and Joseph Henchman
Defendant - Appellant:
United States of America
Adams Steel LLC v. Elkins Constructors Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Adams Steel LLC
Defendant:
Elkins Constructors Inc , Ikhana LLC and Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
STEELE, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01523
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY MONTROIS and ADAM STEELE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Adams Steel, LLC v. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00599
Plaintiff:
Adams Steel, LLC
Defendant:
Caddell Construction Co., Inc. , Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Adams Steel, LLC v. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00196
Plaintiff:
Adams Steel, LLC
Defendant:
Caddell Construction Co., Inc., Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
