Cases 1 - 10 of 31
SHAPIRO v. CIANBRO INC
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
ADAM SHAPIRO
Defendant:
CIANBRO INC doing business as CIANBRO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, SCOTT STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
LAZORE et al v. HARRIGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA LAZORE, JOSEPH BEIZEO and KRISTINA HERBERT
Defendant:
JHON HARRIGAN, KAREN PELLITER, GENE YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PLOURDE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00532
Defendant:
MAINE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN PLOURDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITNEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00299
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, DAVID BERNHARDT, KIRK FRANCIS and others
Plaintiff:
REBECCA WHITNEY and DUSTIN WHITNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ADAMS v. NURSE AT RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2019cv00214
Defendant:
NURSE AT RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL and WORKERS AT RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. A DUIE PYLE INC
as 2:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
SARAH ADAMS
Defendant:
A DUIE PYLE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN ADAMS
Defendant:
RANDY ADAMS, MEGAN ADAMS and ROSE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
