Cases 41 - 50 of 7,549
Gregson v. City of San Marcos et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Gregson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Hays County, Officer John Reeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Labat
as 1:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee, III
Defendant:
Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Adam Pajer v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11146
Plaintiff:
ADAM PAJER
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc. v. City of Port Aransas et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Port Aransas, David Parsons, Adams . Rick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Pilot Company et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Pilot Company, Hinds County Sheriff Department, Adam L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VARGO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J VARGO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and ADAM P WASSELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Divelbiss, Randin v. Wollin, Sam et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Randin Divelbiss
Defendant:
Chief Sam Wollin, Officer Smith and Adams Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
