Cases 1 - 10 of 1,039
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poitra v. USA
as 3:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Adam Jason Poitra
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodney Hurdsman v. Rodney Wright, et al
as 24-1997
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant:
Viapath Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Globel Tel-Link, Rodney Wright, Sheriff, Saline County, Saline County, Arkansas and others
Wyner v. Dockery et al
as 4:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Wyner
Defendant:
Sergeant Dockery, Sergeant Frazier, Lieutenant Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Mainieri v. USA
as 4:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
Adam Joseph Mainieri
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Courtney v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00627
Petitioner:
Antonio Courtney
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiseman v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Edward Wiseman
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Minnesota Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Rayco DelShaune Traylor
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept of Corrections, Binkley, Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
