Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Perez-Rosas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00678
Plaintiff:
Adriana Perez-Rosas and Francisco Rosas
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Angelica Perez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2018cv01315
Plaintiff:
Adriana Perez and Angelica Perez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Perez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2017at00852
Plaintiff:
Angelica Perez and Adriana Perez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Perez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2017cv02382
Plaintiff:
Adriana Perez and Angelica Perez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Perez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as CAE/2:17-CV-02382
Plaintiff:
Perez, Angelica Perez and Adriana Perez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
BOHORQUEZ et al v. DE MORENO PIRAQUIVE et al
as 2:2017cv05075
Plaintiff:
DORIS BOHORQUEZ and RALPH FOUBISTER
Defendant:
MARIA LUISA DE MORENO PIRAQUIVE, CARLOS ALBERTO BAENA LOPEZ, ALEXANDRA MORENO PIRAQUIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Perez-Rosas v. Click Connect, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00271
Defendant:
Shayan Amlani, Asif Bhimani, Click Connect, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Adriana Perez-Rosas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Perez v. Independent Management Services of Minnesota, Inc.
as 0:2017cv00799
Plaintiff:
Adriana Perez
Defendant:
Independent Management Services of Minnesota, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
