Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
United States of America v. Hage (Salim)
as 23-6185
Defendant:
WADIH EL-HAGE, FAZUL ABDULLAH MOHAMMED, MOHAMED SADEEK ODEH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MAMDOUH MAHMUD SALIM, Abu Hajer al Iraqi and Abu Hajer
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
AHMED v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2022cv03523
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AHMED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diaz v. A & M Tasty Snacks, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv07361
Plaintiff:
Felix Diaz
Defendant:
Utz Quality Foods, Inc., Utz Quality Foods, LLC, A & M Tasty Snacks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
