Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Charlton Dowling v. Gregory Voigt
as 11-6748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLTON JAVIER DOWLING
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY VOIGT, J. AL CANNON, JR., Esq. and CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kristopher Door v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 11-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTOPHER DOOR
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, AUTO ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and others
Richard v. Modica et al
as 0:2011cv01192
Petitioner:
Naarl Richard
Respondent:
J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorr v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2011cv11542
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Dorr
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Mazda Motor Corporation, Auto Alliance International and others
Simmons v. Cannon et al
as 2:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Jr , Charleston County , Mase and Company LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Charles E Masencup and Mase and Company LLC
Cross_defendant:
Al Cannon, Jr and Charleston County
Counter_claimant:
Charles E Masencup and Mase and Company LLC
Counter_defendant:
Roosevelt Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. County of Charleston et al
as 2:2011cv00660
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
County of Charleston , Charleston County Sheriff's Office , Al Cannon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dowling v. Cannon
as 9:2011cv00633
Petitioner:
Charlton Javier Dowling
Respondent:
J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dowling v. Voigt et al
as 9:2011cv00634
Plaintiff:
Charlton Javier Dowling
Defendant:
Gregory Voigt, J Al Cannon, Jr and Carolina Center for Occupational Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Aiken v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2010cv02664
Plaintiff:
James I Aiken
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Jr , Chief Lucas , Major Hardgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
