Cases 1 - 8 of 8
YOUNG v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2021cv04718
Plaintiff:
REGINALD YOUNG
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, LEO DUNN, VICTOR W. WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELOUS v. GANNON, et al
as 2:2019cv06186
Defendant:
ILYA BELOUS, Sergeant JOHN DOE DAVIDSECK, Dr. JOHN DOE AND NURSES JANE DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salem-Robinson et al v. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation
as CAN/5:14-cv-02209
Plaintiff:
Sarah Salem-Robinson and Alan A. Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation and Richard Wolf GmbH
Salem-Robinson et al v. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation
as 4:2014cv02209
Plaintiff:
Sarah Salem-Robinson and Alan A. Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, successor to Mid America Bank, FSB, successor to Fidelity Federal Savings Bank v. Condiff
as 1:2013cv06940
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank, successor to Mid America Bank, FSB, successor to Fidelity Federal Savings Bank
Defendant:
Reco A. Condiff, RAC Management Corp., Jesus Maravilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00453
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
ROBINSON v. MCNEIL
as 3:2009cv00233
Petitioner:
ALAN G ROBINSON
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
