Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Monk v. Massey
as 24-40021
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, Officer at Bowie County Detention Center, FNU Bennett, Lt. Bowie County Dentention Center, FNU Vonn, Lieutenant Bowie County Detention Center and others
Monk v. Massey et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, FNU Vonn, FNU Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Alan Owen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Owen v. Zuchowski
as 2:2018cv00048
Petitioner:
Charles Alan Owen
Respondent:
Laura Zuchowski
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Masimo v. Dairyland Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv00627
Plaintiff:
Annie E. Masimo
Defendant:
Dairyland Insurance Company, Alan Owen, Jeanine Kairanga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana
as 4:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Alan Owens
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Owen v. Sports Gymnastics Federation o
as 13-1277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ALAN OWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SPORTS GYMNASTICS FEDERATION OF RUSSIA, Public Organization Registered in the Russian Federation
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty, Inc et al
as 4:2013mc00033
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty, Inc, Petroquest Resources, Inc., Harvey Milam and others
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00693
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty Inc, Petroquest Resources Inc, Harvey Milam and others
Fogerty et al v. Condor Guaranty Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00692
Plaintiff:
Richard Fogerty and William Tacon
Defendant:
Condor Guaranty Inc, Petroquest Resources Inc, Harvey Milam and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
