Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Thomas v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Albert Thomas, III
Respondent:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maxwell v. Thomas
as 23-40699
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Maxwell
Respondent / Appellee:
Albert Thomas, III, Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Lenz v. American Security Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv06800
Plaintiff:
Albert Thomas Lenz
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Unknown v Unknown
as 1:2023cv04308
Plaintiff:
Albert Thomas and CHICAGO TEACHERS' PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Thomas v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01894
Plaintiff:
Albert Thomas
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Albert Thomas v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Dailey v. Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony Raye Dailey
Defendant:
Albert Thomas, III, FNU Boyd, FNU Asay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Albert Thomas v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 22-13851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14995
Plaintiff:
MICHAE ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
