Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ALCOA CORPORATION et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
INTALCO ALUMINUM, LLC, NORTHWEST ALLOYS, INC., ALUMAX MILL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ALCOA CORPORATION et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv01261
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
INTALCO ALUMINUM, LLC, NORTHWEST ALLOYS, INC., ALUMAX MILL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The State of North Carolina v. Alcoa Power Generating, Inc.
as 15-2225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, by and through its agency, the North Carolina Department of Administration
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCOA POWER GENERATING, INC.
:
State of North Carolina v. Alcoa Power Generating, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00633
Defendant:
Alcoa Power Generating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The State of North Carolina
Movant:
Yadkin Riverkeeper, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SWAN v. ALCOA POWER GENERATING, INC.
as 4:2010cv00025
Defendant:
ALCOA POWER GENERATING, INC.
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SWAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alcoa Power Generating Inc. v. FERC
as 10-1066
Petitioner:
Alcoa Power Generating Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WI Pub Power Inc v. FERC
as 04-1414
Petitioner:
Wisconsin Public Power Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
WPS Resources Corporation, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, Upper Peninsula Power Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Great Lakes Utilities and Xcel Energy Services Inc.
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.