Cases 1 - 10 of 270
XELUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 1:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
TUSHKHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GINA RAIMONDO, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified:
Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant:
Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis et al v. Quarantillo et al
as 1:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Rosezina Ellis and Gurbannepes Igdirov
Defendant:
Andrea Quarantillo, USCIS, Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nelson v. Mayorkas
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
CAMERON NELSON
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
