Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ALEMAR v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-03579
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL ALEMAR
ALEMAR v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv03579
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL ALEMAR
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alemar v. Long
as 1:2022cv02899
Plaintiff:
Jose Alemar
Defendant:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alemar v. Reichert, et al
as 20-1432
Defendant / Appellee:
TABATA, Nurse and DOCTOR BRYAN REICHERT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ALEMAR
Alemar v. Reichert et al
as 1:2020cv02855
Defendant:
Tabzte, Bryan Reichert and Tabata
Plaintiff:
Jose Alemar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alemar v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2017cv03183
Plaintiff:
Jose Alemar
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alemar v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2016cv02622
Petitioner:
Jose Alemar
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alemar v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2015cv00937
Petitioner:
Jose Alemar
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Escuela de Medicina San Juan Bautista, Inc. v. Liason Committee on Medical Education et al
as 3:2011cv02014
Plaintiff:
Escuela de Medicina San Juan Bautista, Inc.
Defendant:
Liason Committee on Medical Education , American Medical Association and Association of American Medical Colleges
Amicu:
Puerto Rico Council of Education
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Dianeth F. Medina-Diaz, Javier Quintero, Neysa Perez and others
Intervenor:
Andres Perez-Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Alemar-Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv01936
Plaintiff:
Ramonita Alemar-Cruz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
