Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Dyer v. The City Of New York
as 1:2023cv03664
Plaintiff:
Jahira Dyer
Defendant:
The City of New York and New York City Police Detective Alexander Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santiago v. Cross et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Alexander Santiago
Defendant:
Lt Cross, Warden Lue and SIS Weissinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
SANTIAGO v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04410
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALEXANDER SANTIAGO
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, TRANS UNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC. and RENTSPREE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LOPEZ v. COROZAL AUTO REPAIR INC et al
as 2:2021cv17366
Plaintiff:
ERIC LOPEZ
Defendant:
COROZAL AUTO REPAIR INC, A & A COROZAL AUTO REPAIR, LLC, RAFEAL SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Santiago v. Inflection Risk Solutions LLC
as 3:2021cv02563
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alexander Santiago
Defendant:
Inflection Risk Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43665
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01071
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. ELCHEBLI et al
as 3:2020cv00650
Defendant:
JAMEL ELCHEBLI and RELIGIOUS ISSUE COMMITTEE
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. USA
as 4:2019cv00098
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alexander Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santiago v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv11913
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Alexander Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
