Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 25-3143
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS DAVIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Jones v. The Madison County Department of Human Resources et al
as 5:2025cv00657
Plaintiff:
Caroline D. Jones
Defendant:
The Madison County Department of Human Resources, Alexis Davis, Christopher Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Madison County Department of Human Resources et al
as 5:2025cv00261
Plaintiff:
William David Jones
Defendant:
Madison County Department of Human Resources, Alexis Davis, Patricia Demos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Services
as 1:2025cv00629
Plaintiff:
Alexis Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 5:2021cv01559
Plaintiff:
Alexis Davis
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01382
Plaintiff:
Alexis Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lavender v. Coats et al
as 8:2009cv02252
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Lavender
Defendant:
Jim Coats, Alexis Davis, Michael J. Castine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavender v. Coats et al
as 8:2009cv01404
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Lavender
Defendant:
Jim Coats, Alexis Davis, Michael J. Castine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
