Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Rodriguez-Benejam et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01006
Plaintiff:
Enrique Rodriguez-Benejam , Ana M. Rodriguez-Nogues , Enrique Rodriguez-Nogues and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Terry
as 13-3759
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alfredo Rodriguez and Maurice Baptiste
Defendant - Appellant:
Johnny Terry, AKA Blaze
Rodriguez-Arellano v. USA
as 4:2013cv00324
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Alfredo Rodriguez-Arellano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodriguez-Arellano v. USA
as 4:2013cv00323
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Alfredo Rodriguez-Arellano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Salinas et al v. Starjem Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv02992
Plaintiff:
Enrique Salinas , Alfredo Rodriguez , Angel Cedeno and others
Defendant:
Starjem Restaurant Corp. , Marion Scotto and Anthony Scotto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ramos et al
as 5:2013cv02001
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ignacia Renteria Ramos and Alfredo Rodriguez Ramos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Communications Act of 1994
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01798
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jose Rodriguez-Soto
as 13-10241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ-SOTO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
