Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Burl Anderson Howell v. George A. Wood
as 18-1315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BURL ANDERSON HOWELL and ALICE A. HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. WOOD, County Manager for the Wayne County NC Department of Social Services (WCNCDSS) in his managerial capacity for injunctive relief, RESEE PHELPS, Income Maintenance Supervisor for WCNCDSS sued in her individual and official capacities for monetary and equitable relief, LOU JONES, Case Worker for WCNCDSS sued directly in her individual for same and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00536
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Burl Howell v. Daniel Horne, Jr.
as 17-2000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BURL ANDERSON HOWELL and ALICE A. HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL M. HORNE, JR.
Howell et al v. Wood et al
as 5:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Burl Anderson Howell and Alice Annette Howell
Defendant:
George A. Wood, Resee Phelps, Lou Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell et al v. Horne
as 5:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Burl Anderson Howell and Alice Annette Howell
Defendant:
Daniel M. Horne, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NuCar Connection, Inc. v. Burl Howell
as 17-1355
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NUCAR CONNECTION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
BURL ANDERSON HOWELL and ALICE A. HOWELL
NuCar Connection, Inc. v. Howell et al
as 5:2016cv00870
Defendant:
Burl A. Howell and Alice A. Howell
Plaintiff:
NuCar Connection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Condit-Howell et al
as 3:2015cv01524
Plaintiff:
Mary Alice Condit-Howell , Nelly M Cosme-Condit , Alice Cosme-Condit and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Minch v. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv00858
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Minch
Defendant:
Karen Brown, Alice T. Howell, A. Lincoln James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
